Skip to main content
CYPEX Documentation
Support
v2.0.0 Latest stable release View changelog ->

Roles and permissions

This page describes the v2.0.0 role model and how roles, JWTs, and RLS policies work together to enforce multi-tenant isolation.

Role summary

All three roles are created as NOLOGIN group roles. Humans (and the authenticator pool) log in as other roles that are granted membership in these groups — they never LOGIN as cypex_admin, cypex_user, or organization_admin themselves.

Read full post

Default password policy

The v2.0.0 upgrade installs a default password policy by inserting a row into cypex.t_config with key password_policy. This page documents the policy, how to verify it on your instance, and how to override it.

The default policy

The migration inserts:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
{
  "minLength": 4,
  "minUppercase": 0,
  "minLowercase": 0,
  "minNumbers": 0,
  "minSpecial": 0
}

This is very permissive by design. The rationale is that shipping a working default is preferable to locking existing users out at upgrade time. Once the upgrade is complete, administrators should review the policy and tighten it to match their security requirements.

Read full post

Organizations

Info
This page is the admin-panel entry point for the Organizations screen. The full conceptual and procedural documentation lives in Organizations. This page covers the GUI surface and what an operator can change there.

In CYPEX, an Organization is the unit of multi-tenancy. It is the data boundary that decides which rows a user can see, insert, update, or delete. Organizations are not an authorization system on their own — they add a per-request data scope on top of the existing PostgreSQL role-based capability model. Both dimensions must agree before a row is returned. See Capabilities vs data scope.

Read full post

Detailed organization setup

Info
Looking for the conceptual reference (“what is an Organization?”)? See Organizations.

After the v2.0.0 upgrade, every CYPEX deployment starts with a single Default Organization that holds all existing data. This page is the entry point for setting up additional organizations and assigning existing clients / schemas to them.

When to read this

  • You want to split a single-tenant deployment into multiple organizations (one per client, per business unit, or per environment).
  • You need to backfill the organization_id column on existing application-schema tables.
  • You are operating the cutover from “everything on Default Organization” to “each row tagged with the right organization.”

Pages in this section

  1. Prepare the existing database — pre-flight checks, downtime planning, smoke-test environment.
  2. Enable RLS — the SQL primitives for enabling and configuring RLS on application-schema tables.
  3. Assign clients to organizations — uses the client-add-organization-id SQL template.
  4. Verify and roll back — verification queries and the rollback procedure if something goes wrong.

Prerequisite reading

Reference assets

Schema Access

Schema Access decides which PostgreSQL schemas an organization may use. It is the coarsest of the three access controls in v2.0.0 and it sits above the other two: an organization that has not been granted a schema sees nothing in it, regardless of role capabilities and regardless of what the RLS policy would have allowed.

Sidebar location: Access Control → Advanced (System admin) → Schema Access. This page is System Administrator only (system admin visibility). An Organization Administrator cannot grant their own organization a schema — by design, since doing so would let a tenant widen its own boundary.

Read full post

Migrations

This section contains upgrade guides for CYPEX administrators, DBAs, and operations engineers. Use these guides when moving an existing CYPEX deployment from one major version to the next, especially when the upgrade involves schema or permission-model changes.

From v2.0.0 onward, multi-tenant isolation is a database property: PostgreSQL Row-Level Security (RLS) scopes every query. Application-layer filters are not the security boundary.

The guides are written with factual upgrade behavior in mind: what the migrations actually do, what is additive, what is breaking, what is behavior-changing, and what the rollback constraints are.

Read full post